background

Thank you for your interest in the Tough Talks Research Study

We’re currently looking for men who can take part in a 6-month study to test out the app we’ve developed to help young men practice HIV disclosure.

Sign Up   

Resources

 

Thank you for joining the Tough Talks Research Study!

We understand that talking about HIV status and stigma can bring up difficult memories and emotions. The added stress from the COVID-19 pandemic can make this time particularly challenging and thus the right time to ask for support. Please feel free to reach out to the study staff and/or utilize the resources below. 

Self Help

Virtual Chat & Discussion Group

Resilience & Mental Health Resources

Resources for People With HIV

COVID-19 Information

Additional Resources

For more resources, please visit the Behavior and Technology Lab (BATLab) website. We are grateful that you are part of our BATLab community and want to prioritize your health and wellness through these networks.

HIV Disclosure and State Laws

Most states created HIV disclosure laws in response to the discovery of HIV in the 1980s, when there was extreme fear and misinformation. In some states, these laws have changed to reflect advances in HIV care and our understanding of HIV, while in other states these laws remain unchanged. As a result, some states have laws that unfairly criminalize people with HIV, ranging from small misdemeanors to felonies with prison time. Disclosure should be your decision, but it is important to understand the laws in your state when you are making decisions about disclosure.

States A - H

  • Alabama

    • People with HIV may face enhanced felony penalties for exposing someone to bodily fluids, including saliva and urine that do not transmit HIV.
    • In addition, Alabama has prosecuted incidents of HIV exposure under general criminal laws.
    • The Alabama State Board of Health may quarantine, isolate, or civilly commit people with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) such as HIV.

    Bottom Line: Alabama has no protections for people with HIV. The laws don’t reflect updates or advances in HIV care, or take into account how it is actually transmitted. Disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure, if possible. Learn more about Alabama’s disclosure laws. 

  • Alaska

    • A person’s HIV status may lead to higher prison sentences for felony sex offenses.
    • The Alaska Department of Health and Social Services may quarantine or isolate people with HIV or an STI and may disclose an individual’s identifiable health information during the course of a legal proceeding. 

    Bottom line: Unfortunately, there are no protections under the law for people with HIV in Alaska. Instead, people may encounter enhanced sentences because of their status. Learn more about Alaska’s disclosure laws.

  • Arizona

    • In Arizona, there are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure.
    • However, people with HIV or other STIs may be prosecuted with a misdemeanor for exposure even without transmission.
    • People with HIV may qualify for mitigation or reduction of their prison sentences because of their status.

    Bottom line: While there are no laws explicitly addressing HIV exposure, people can still be charged for exposure without transmission for an STI.
    Learn more about Arizona’s disclosure laws.

  • Arkansas

    • People with HIV may be criminally charged for a range of acts, from general criminal laws like aggravated assault to the criminal exposure statute. If convicted of the latter, one may be required to register as a sex offender.
    • It’s a misdemeanor to not disclose one’s HIV status before receiving medical treatment, punishable by a $2,500 fine and/or one year in prison.
    • A person’s medical files may be used in their prosecution for criminal exposure to HIV. 

    Bottom line: Sadly there are no protections for people with HIV in Arkansas. Based on outdated facts and research, laws allow harsh charges to be convicted, including a requirement to register as a sex offender.
    Learn more about Arkansas’ disclosure laws.

  • California

    • People with HIV may be prosecuted for “specific intent” to transmit, in addition to conviction under general criminal laws.
    • If a person with HIV or an STI disregards a health officer’s instructions, they may be charged with a misdemeanor.

    • The defendant and witness charged under California’s intentional transmission statute are entitled to privacy protections.
    • People with HIV may receive increased sentences or aggravated assault charges for sex crimes.
    • Before 2018, a person with HIV convicted of prostitution could be found guilty of a felony and imprisoned for up to three years. Fortunately, this is now invalid and vacated.
    • A person who engaged in sex work and is currently serving a sentence for prostitution while with HIV may request the court to dismiss or recall their sentence.

    Bottom line: California has passed laws to better reflect updates and advances about HIV, from invalidating old laws to providing new protections not previously present. While status can still play a factor in convictions and sentences, California is perhaps one of the best states for people with HIV.
    Learn more about California’s disclosure laws.

  • Colorado

    • People with HIV in Colorado may receive more severe sentences for sex offenses like sexual assault because of their HIV status. Even if applied leniently, this statute allows a person with HIV to receive triple the minimum sentence a defendant would otherwise receive for the same crime.
    • HIV exposure cases have been prosecuted under general criminal laws in Colorado.
    • State or local health authorities may impose restrictive measures for people with HIV, such as an order to cease and desist from conduct deemed a “risk to public health.”

    Bottom line: Unfortunately, Colorado laws allow people with HIV to receive more severe sentences because of their status. Even if applied lightly, a person can receive triple the sentence simply because they have HIV. Disclose when you can, and have proof if possible.
    Learn more about Colorado’s disclosure laws.

  • Connecticut

    • In Connecticut, there are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure.
    • A person housed in a correctional facility may be barred from release if they have an infectious disease. While not clearly defined, this can include a wide range of STIs from syphilis to HIV.

    Bottom line: Connecticut does not have any criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure. However, people with HIV have been prosecuted for exposure under general criminal laws, so disclose when you can and have proof if possible.
    Learn more about Connecticut’s disclosure laws.

  • Delaware

    • In Delaware, there are no explicit statutes criminalizing HIV transmission or exposure except for organ, tissue, or semen donations.
    • People with an STI may be required to undergo mandatory examination and treatment, in addition to isolation or quarantine with a fine for non-compliance.

    Bottom line: While Delaware does not have any criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV transmission or exposure, people with HIV have been prosecuted under general criminal laws.
    Learn more about Delaware’s disclosure laws.

  • Florida

    • People living with HIV may be charged with a felony for failure to disclose their status to a sexual partner, whether or not a condom is used.
    • People can still be convicted of a crime even if they do not transmit to anyone else.

    Bottom line: While Florida has no protection for individuals living with HIV. Disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure, if possible.
    Learn more about Florida’s disclosure laws.

  • Georgia

    • It is against the law to not disclose HIV status prior to engaging in any sexual activity (anal, oral, or penile-vaginal sex) with another person, regardless of intent or HIV transmission. Neither viral load or use of a condom can serve as a defense during prosecution.
    • It is against the law to share needles or syringes without first disclosing HIV status, regardless of intent or transmission.
    • It is a felony to engage in sex work without first disclosing HIV status, regardless of risk or or actual HIV transmission.
    • It is against the law to donate blood or body tissues without first disclosing HIV status.
    • It is against the law to use bodily fluids as an assault, with the intent to transmit HIV, against any peace or correctional officer engaged in their duties, even if HIV is not transmitted, under Georgia’s “HIV reckless conduct statute.”

    Bottom line: While Unfortunately, there are limited protections under the law for someone living with HIV in Georgia. In many scenarios, it is required by law to disclose HIV status, and a violation can result in felony penalties. 
    Learn more about Georgia’s disclosure laws.

  • Hawaii

    • In Hawaii, there are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV or STI exposure. However, people with HIV have been prosecuted for exposure under general criminal laws such as reckless endangerment or aggravated assault.

    Bottom line: Hawaii does not have any laws explicitly addressing HIV exposure. However, people with HIV can be prosecuted under general criminal laws. 
    Learn more about Hawaii’s disclosure laws.

States I - M

  • Idaho

    • In Idaho, people with HIV can face felony charges for failing to disclose their status to their sexual partners. If there is “intent to transmit,” exposure of any means is enough for prosecution, including conduct like spitting with no threat of transmission.
    • Additionally, sharing needles or syringes is a felony for people with HIV.
    • HIV status must be disclosed before donating blood, semen, body tissues, or organs.
    • A person with a venereal disease, including HIV, can be prosecuted for exposing another to a disease.

    Bottom Line: Unfortunately, Idaho’s disclosure laws are heavily based on outdated information and do not leave any protections for people with HIV. Disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Idaho’s disclosure laws. 

  • Illinois

    • It is against the law for a person living with HIV to have condomless sexual intercourse without first disclosing their HIV status, even if HIV is not transmitted.
    • If an HIV-positive person discloses their status or uses a condom during sexual activity then this will be used as a defense during prosecution for having sex with a partner.
    • It is against the law for people living with HIV to donate or provide blood, tissue, semen, organ, or other bodily fluids.
    • It is against to law to share any non-sterile injection equipment with other, even if actual exposure or transmission does not occur.

    Bottom Line: Using a condom regardless of disclosing HIV status may be a valid defense under the law, but still carries some risk in the state of Illinois.
    Learn more about Illinois’ disclosure laws. 

  • Indiana

    • People with HIV can face felony charges for not disclosing their status to sexual partners or needle-sharing partners.
    • It’s a felony for people with HIV to expose someone to any bodily fluid, including those known not to transmit HIV such as urine or saliva.
    • People with HIV have also been charged under general criminal laws.
    • A person’s medical records may be accessed to aid in their prosecution, and may be subject to quarantine and isolation.

    Bottom Line: Unfortunately Indiana does not provide any protections for people with HIV. The laws are rooted in outdated and antiquated information and do not reflect current knowledge about HIV. Disclose when you can and have proof if possible.  Learn more about Indiana’s disclosure laws. 

  • Iowa

    • Intentional or reckless exposure to HIV or other communicable diseases may result in prosecution and imprisonment under Iowa’s criminal infection transmission statue.
    • In addition, a person with an STI may be subject to mandatory treatment and examination.

    Bottom Line: Iowa’s laws do not provide any protections for people with HIV.
    Learn more about Iowa’s disclosure laws. 

  • Kansas

    • People with HIV or other communicable diseases may be charged with a felony for having sex with the intent to expose another person.
    • People with HIV are prohibited from donating blood, blood products, semen, human tissue, organs, or body fluids; in addition from sharing needles or syringes.

    • HIV and other STIs are excluded from mandatory quarantine or isolation.

    Bottom Line: In Kansas, it’s possible to be charged with a felony for failing to disclose HIV status, so disclose when you can and have proof if possible.
    Learn more about Kansas’ disclosure laws. 

  • Kentucky

    • People with HIV engaging in sex work or solicitation may face felony charges, punishable by one to five years in prison and up to a $10,000 fine.
    • People with HIV are prohibited from donating organs, skin, or other human tissues.
    • People with HIV can be charged with a misdemeanor for assaulting a peace officer using bodily fluids, even though some methods have never shown HIV transmission.
    • People with HIV have been prosecuted under Kentucky’s general criminal laws for non-disclosure and for conduct such as spitting.

    Bottom Line: Many of Kentucky’s laws are based on old and outdated information about HIV, penalizing acts like spitting that don’t transmit HIV. Avoid this by disclosing when you can and try to have proof you disclosed if possible.
    Learn more about Kentucky’s disclosure laws. 

  • Louisiana

    • It is against the law to intentionally expose someone to HIV through sex, even if it is an accident or if HIV is not transmitted.
    • If an HIV-positive person discloses their status then they likely won’t be prosecuted for having sex with a partner.
    • Even though HIV cannot be spread through saliva, people living with HIV can be charged with a crime if they bite or spit on someone else.
    • Anyone found to have intentionally exposed someone to HIV must register as a sex offender, and in extreme cases may be brought to court for attempted murder.

    Bottom Line: The laws don’t reflect updates or advances in HIV care, or take into account how HIV is actually transmitted. Disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure, if possible.
    Learn more about Louisiana’s disclosure laws. 

  • Maine

    • The Maine Department of Health and Human Services may quarantine, isolate, or mandate treatment for people with a sexually transmitted infection, including HIV. 

    Bottom Line: While Maine does not have any laws explicitly addressing HIV, people with STIs may be required to isolate or have mandatory treatment.
    Learn more about Maine’s disclosure laws. 

  • Maryland

    • It is against the law for a person living with HIV to knowingly transfer, or attempt to transfer, HIV to another person. This holds for a variety of activities including sex, blood and tissue donation, breastfeeding, and/or needle sharing. Neither disclosure nor using condoms and other protection will necessarily serve as a defense under prosecution.
    • Spitting, biting, and blood exposure in Maryland by a person living with HIV can also be activities that fall within the realm of activities listed above.

    Bottom Line: Maryland has a very broad (and extremely dated) HIV exposure law that can be applied to any sort of HIV exposure.
    Learn more about Maryland’s disclosure laws. 

  • Massachusetts

    • Massachusetts has a vague law which states that STDs, including HIV, can be cause for enhanced criminal sentences, specifically if the sexual partner is under 16 years old, regardless of transmission. There aren’t currently examples of how this law may be implemented.
    • Although there aren’t any explicit criminal statues regarding HIV in Massachusetts, there are examples where people living with HIV have been prosecuted under general criminal laws.

    Bottom Line: There are no clear or specific laws on criminalization based on HIV status, however, there are still instances where people living with HIV have been prosecuted in Massachusetts.
    Learn more about Massachusetts’ disclosure laws. 

  • Michigan

    • People with HIV may be prosecuted for specific intent to transmit under the uninformed partner statute. However, this is unconstitutionally overbroad and has faced multiple legal challenges.
    • Under Michigan’s bioterrorism laws, people with HIV may be prosecuted or receive enhanced sentences because of their status.
    • Donating blood or blood products is a criminal offense for people with HIV.
    • People with HIV may be required to undergo medical examination, treatment, or be subject to commitment by the Department of Health.

    Bottom Line: Unfortunately, Michigan does not provide any protections for people with HIV, and can face prosecution for reckless exposure even without transmission. Disclose when you can, and try to have proof you disclosed if possible. Learn more about Michigan’s disclosure laws. 

  • Minnesota

    • It’s a criminal offense for a person with HIV or an STI to engage in sex without first informing their partner of their status. Neither intent to transmit nor actual transmission are required for prosecution.
    • People with HIV are prohibited from donating blood, organs, semen, or body tissues.
    • Under Minnesota sentencing guidelines, a person charged for sex offenses may receive a higher prison sentence for exposing someone to STIs or HIV.
    • People with an STI may be subject to testing, treatment, and institutional commitment.

    Bottom Line: Minnesota’s laws allow for more severe sentences based on one’s HIV status, and allow prosecution even without intent or actual transmission. Disclose when you can and try to have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Minnesota’s disclosure laws. 

  • Mississippi

    • It is a felony in Mississippi to knowingly expose another to HIV, regardless of intent or actual transmission of HIV. This encompasses exposure through sexual activity, needle-sharing, blood/tissue/organ/semen donation, and spiting/biting/blood exposure to another.
    • Exposing another prisoner, prison guard, or prison to visitor to any bodily fluid (including saliva) is against the law. 

    Bottom Line: Missouri has some of the harshest and most antiquated laws surrounding HIV disclosure, with up to 30 years in prison for not disclosing status beforehand. Especially since using a condom cannot be used as a defense, disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Mississippi’s disclosure laws. 

  • Missouri

    • Missouri’s HIV-exposure statute allows someone to be charged with exposing someone through sex without first disclosing status by up to 30 years in prison. In addition, using a condom cannot be used as a defense.
    • Acts posing little to no risk of HIV transmission like spitting or biting can be charged with felonies and up to 15 years in prison.
    • People with HIV face potential criminal penalties if they donate blood, organs, semen, or tissue unless such donation is for medical research.
    • It’s a felony for a person with HIV to share needles and not disclose their status.
    • Sex workers may receive enhanced sentences for prostitution if they know they have HIV. Additionally, sexual predator statutes have been applied to people with HIV solely based on their status. 

    Bottom Line: Missouri has some of the harshest and most antiquated laws surrounding HIV disclosure, with up to 30 years in prison for not disclosing status beforehand. Especially since using a condom cannot be used as a defense, disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Missouri’s disclosure laws. 

  • Montana

    • Exposing someone to an STI can be punishable as a misdemeanor under the communicable disease statute and under general criminal laws by up to six months in prison and a $500 fine.
    • The Department of Public Health and Human Services may play a role in prosecutions under the state exposure law.

    Bottom Line: While there are no laws addressing HIV exposure, people with an STI can be charged for “knowingly” exposing someone to a disease.
    Learn more about Montana’s disclosure laws. 

States N - O

  • Nebraska

    • There are currently no punitive State measures based on a person’s HIV or STI status. However, the state may quarantine and isolate people to prevent or limit the spread of a communicable disease.

    Bottom Line: Fortunately, there are no laws surrounding a person’s HIV or STI status in Nebraska. However, health officials have broad powers to treat and isolate people with STIs.
    Learn more about Nebraska’s disclosure laws. 

  • Nevada

    • In Nevada, people with HIV can be charged with two to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine for engaging in conduct known to transmit HIV, even without intent to expose or actual transmission.
    • People with HIV can be charged with a misdemeanor for engaging in sex work.
    • Health authorities have broad powers to prevent transmission of an infectious disease and may require a medical examination of a person they suspect has an infectious disease.

    Bottom Line: Nevada’s laws unfairly charge people with HIV and do not reflect current knowledge about transmission. Especially since neither intent nor actual transmission are required for prosecution, disclose when you can and have proof if possible. Learn more about Nevada’s disclosure laws. 

  • New Hampshire

    • There are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure, but people with HIV have faced prosecution under general criminal laws.
    • People with HIV may be subject to mandatory testing, treatment, quarantine, and isolation.

    Bottom Line: While there are no laws explicitly surrounding HIV exposure, people have been prosecuted under general criminal laws and are subject to broad powers for health officials. Disclose when you can, and learn more about New Hampshire’s disclosure laws. 

  • New Jersey

    • It is against the law to engage in any sexual activity without first disclosing HIV status, regardless of intent to transmit, or actual transmission of HIV. Sexual activities in the law encompass oral, anal, vaginal, and penetration of either the anus or vagina by the person’s hand, finger, or other object.

    Bottom Line: The laws in New Jersey require disclosure of status prior to engaging in any sexual activity and informed consent of the partner. There are also cases in which people living with HIV in New Jersey have been found guilty of attempt to murder regardless of transmission, and in two cases for biting corrections officers (despite the fact saliva does not transmit HIV).
    Learn more about New Jersey’s disclosure laws.

  • New Mexico

    • There are no statutes explicitly criminalizing HIV or STI transmission or exposure in New Mexico.

    Bottom Line: Thankfully there are no laws criminalizing HIV exposure in New Mexico. Learn more about New Mexico’s disclosure laws. 

  • New York

    • A person living with an STI (including HIV), may be guilty of a misdemeanor if they have sex with another person, whether or not they have disclosed or used a condom.
    • Bodily fluids of someone with HIV are not considered a deadly weapon. 

    Bottom Line: Sadly, there is little protection from the law for someone with HIV. Bodily fluids are not considered a deadly weapon, but sexual relations with anyone puts someone living with HIV at risk of a misdemeanor.
    Learn more about New York’s disclosure laws. 

  • North Carolina

    • If an HIV-positive person is in care, adherent to meds, and undetectable for at least six months, they do not have to disclose to sexual partners.
    • People who are not in care, not following a treatment plan, or have a detectable viral load do have to disclose HIV status to partners.
    • If a person is undetectable for at least six months, their partner is HIV-positive or a negative partner is on PrEP, the HIV-positive person does not have to use a condom. 

    Bottom Line: If you are in care and undetectable, you are not, under law, required to disclose your status.
    Learn more about North Carolina’s disclosure laws. 

  • North Dakota

    • In North Dakota, one must disclose their HIV status before sexual activity and must use condoms or other forms of protection.
    • People with HIV may face criminal charges for sharing needles.
    • Sex workers with HIV may have their medical records released by the state health officer.

    Bottom Line: With neither intent nor actual transmission required for conviction, be sure to disclose your status and have proof of disclosure if possible. North Dakota’s laws do not reflect current research on HIV, so keep up to date with their disclosure laws.
    Learn more about North Dakota’s disclosure laws. 

  • Ohio

    • People with HIV can be prosecuted for failing to disclose their status to their sexual partners by up to eight years in prison.
    • If you are prosecuted for failing to disclose your HIV status to someone before sex, you may be required to register as a sex offender.
    • People with HIV may face enhanced criminal penalties for prostitution.
    • People with HIV may face enhanced penalties for exposing others to any bodily fluid like spitting, regardless of the fact that some are not known methods of transmitting HIV.

    Bottom Line: Ohio does not have any protections for people with HIV, but instead provides enhanced criminal penalties for failing to disclose status. From laws prosecuting acts that do not transmit HIV to requiring to register as a sex offender if convicted, be sure to disclose in Ohio when you can and have proof if possible.
    Learn more about Ohio’s disclosure laws. 

  • Oklahoma

    • People with HIV can face felony charges for failing to disclose their status to sexual partners, with up to five years in prison.
    • People with HIV have been prosecuted under Oklahoma’s criminal HIV exposure law for spitting and biting despite remote to no risk of transmission.
    • Public health officials may order mandatory examination, treatment, or quarantine of a person with HIV.

    Bottom Line: People with HIV may face harsh penalties for failing to disclose their status, and may be required to undergo mandatory examination and treatment by health officials. Oklahoma’s laws reflect outdated information about HIV, so stay up to date with their disclosure laws.
    Learn more about Oklahoma’s disclosure laws. 

  • Oregon

    • There are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure, but prosecutions have been charged under general criminal laws, including attempted murder, assault, and reckless endangerment.
    • It is a crime in Oregon to willfully transmit a communicable disease.

    Bottom Line: While there are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV, people have been prosecuted under general criminal laws. Keep up to date with Oregon’s disclosure laws with the link below.
    Learn more about Oregon’s disclosure laws. 

States P - U

  • Pennsylvania

    • There is no official HIV-exposure law, however, people living with HIV have been prosecuted for not disclosing their HIV status to sexual partners.
    • If you are incarcerated and living with HIV, there are increased penalties for knowingly exposing another person to bodily fluids, including saliva, despite the fact that HIV cannot be transmitted through saliva.
    • It is against the law for an HIV-positive person to engage in sex work. 

    Bottom Line: The only official HIV-exposure laws in Pennsylvania are for incarcerated populations and sex workers, however it has still been common for others living with HIV to be prosecuted for not disclosing HIV status prior to a sexual activity.
    Learn more about Pennsylvania’s disclosure laws. 

  • Rhode Island

    • There are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure.

    Bottom Line: Luckily Rhode Island has no criminal statutes addressing HIV exposure. However, people can still be charged under general criminal laws, so disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Rhode Island’s disclosure laws. 

  • South Carolina

    • It is against the law for a person living with HIV to engage in penile-vaginal, anal, or oral sex with another without first disclosing their status, regardless of transmission. Neither the use of condoms or having an undetectable viral load are necessarily protective under the law, if status is not disclosed.
    • Any alleged HIV exposure, including through biting, is punishable by law.
    • Any sex workers who are living with HIV can face largely enhanced sentences, regardless of what the sex act is and what threat it poses to potential transmission.
    • It is against the law to donate blood, organs, tissue, semen, and other bodily fluids for a person, aware of their status, who is living with HIV.
    • It’s against the law for person who knows their status and is living with HIV to share equipment used for injecting drugs, without first disclosing their status.
    • It’s against the law to for anyone with and STI to knowingly expose another to the infection. 

    Bottom Line: South Carolina law states that disclosure before sex is the only protection under law, regardless of condom use, viral load, or transmission. There are other dated laws, and cases where biting has been punished under law.
    Learn more about South Carolina’s disclosure laws. 

  • South Dakota

    • Engaging in sexual intercourse without disclosing HIV status can result in up to 15 years in prison and a $30,000 fine. On top of that, people convicted must also register as a sex offender.
    • It is a felony for people with HIV to provide blood, tissue, semen, organs, body parts, or body fluids for use by another, regardless of intent to transmit or actual transmission.
    • Sharing non-sterile needles or syringes by people with HIV can result in imprisonment.

    Bottom Line: South Dakota has some of the harshest laws against not disclosing before sex, with up to 15 years in prison and requiring to register as a sex offender. Intent to transmit is not required for prosecution, so be sure to disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about South Dakota’s disclosure laws. 

  • Tennessee

    • People with HIV may face criminal penalties for engaging in sexual activities without first disclosing their HIV status, regardless of actual transmission.
    • People with HIV engaging in sex work may face enhanced criminal penalties.
    • A person convicted of criminal HIV exposure is required to register as a sex offender.
    • People with HIV are prohibited from donating blood, organs, tissue, semen, or other bodily fluids. Additionally sharing needles may lead to criminal prosecution.

    Bottom Line: Tennessee has punitive laws for not disclosing one’s HIV status before sex, even if transmission did not happen. Not only can status enhance a sentence, but it can also lead to registering as a sex offender. Disclose when you can, and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Tennessee’s disclosure laws. 

  • Texas

    • Though there is no specific law around HIV exposure or transmission, HIV-positive people have been prosecuted under criminal laws for exposing a sexual partner.
    • Texas courts have found semen of HIV-positive people to be a deadly weapon and convicted individuals based on this fact.
    • Texas can consider an HIV-positive person’s saliva and other bodily fluids to be a deadly weapon, and someone may be charged with assault for failing to disclose their HIV status to a partner. 

    Bottom Line: In Texas, all bodily fluids can be considered a deadly weapon and a person can be convicted based on that fact. Disclosure may help to avoid assault charges.
    Learn more about Texas’ disclosure laws. 

  • Utah

    • People with HIV convicted of sex work and solicitation offenses may receive increased sentences.
    • Utah has a statute that can increase the prison sentence for inmates with HIV for exposing someone to their bodily fluids.

    Bottom Line: Unfortunately people with HIV in Utah can receive enhanced sentences because of their status. Not only can one be prosecuted for exposing someone to bodily fluids, but this involves methods like spit that cannot transmit HIV. Disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Utah’s disclosure laws. 

States V - W

  • Vermont

    • In Vermont, there are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure, but at least one prosecution has arisen under general criminal laws.
    • However, there are laws pertaining to people with STIs, such as punishment for people who have sex while knowingly having an STI, or requiring mandatory examination and treatment by the State.

    Bottom Line: While Vermont does not have any criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure, people can be prosecuted under general criminal laws. Disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Vermont’s disclosure laws. 

  • Virginia

    • It is a punishable felony in Virginia for anyone living with HIV who knows their status and engages in oral, anal, and sex with the intent to transmit HIV to the other person, regardless if transmission occurs. This law also applies to syphilis and Hepatitis B.
    • It is against the law, regardless of intent to transmit, to not disclose HIV status prior to engaging oral, anal, or vaginal sex.
    • It is against the law to donate blood, tissues, organs, or other bodily fluids if the donor is or was infected with HIV; however, the individual must have been instructed that these items may transmit infection.

    Bottom Line: It is illegal to intentionally transmit HIV regardless of transmission, or to engage in any sexual activity without prior disclosure, regardless if there is no intent to transmit.
    Learn more about Virginia’s disclosure laws.

  • Washington

    • A person may be prosecuted for exposing or transmitting HIV to another person with the intent to cause bodily harm, but can include activities that pose little to no risk of transmission like spitting or oral sex.
    • However, disclosure of one’s HIV status may be a defense to prosecution. 
    • People with HIV can be subject to mandatory examination, testing, medical treatment, or detention.

    Bottom Line: Unfortunately, Washington’s laws surrounding HIV transmission and exposure are based on outdated information and do not reflect current research about HIV. People can be prosecuted for acts that do not transmit HIV, so disclose when you can and have proof of disclosure if possible.
    Learn more about Washington’s disclosure laws. 

  • Washington D.C.

    • There are not currently any laws in D.C. that criminalize any sexual conduct based on HIV status, however, there are also not any protections under the law.

    Bottom Line: You are neither protected nor criminalized in D.C. if you are living with HIV for engaging in sexual or other activities.
    Learn more about Washington D.C.’s disclosure laws. 

  • West Virginia

    • West Virginia has a communicable disease statute that criminalizes exposure to STIs, including HIV.
    • Public health officials can mandate treatment for an STI and impose isolation, quarantine, or other restrictive measures.

    Bottom Line: Even though West Virginia does not have any laws explicitly about HIV, there are statutes that criminalize exposure to STIs, including HIV. Health officials have broad powers to mandate treatment or restrictive measures.
    Learn more about West Virginia’s disclosure laws. 

  • Wisconsin

    • While Wisconsin has no statute explicitly criminalizing HIV transmission or exposure, HIV status or infection may lead to heightened penalties for certain sex offenses.
    • Arrests and prosecutions for HIV exposure have also occurred under general criminal laws.

    Bottom Line: Wisconsin does not have any laws explicitly addressing HIV exposure, but status may play a factor in determining penalties. Prosecutions have also been made under general criminal laws, so disclose when you can and have proof if possible.
    Learn more about Wisconsin’s disclosure laws. 

  • Wyoming

    • There are no criminal statutes explicitly addressing HIV exposure.
    • A person accused of a crime involving the “exchange of bodily fluids” is required to submit to HIV and STI testing, which could be used in a criminal prosecution.
    • A person with HIV can be isolated and required to undergo examination and treatment.

    Bottom Line: While there are no laws explicitly addressing HIV exposure, there are statutes that may require testing, isolation, and examination of people with STIs. Learn more about Wyoming’s disclosure laws. 

Let's get you started

Sign up to participate in our research study today!

Keeping up with Research

Check out the results of the study on the BATLab website. You can also find additional research studies that you may be interested in joining.